VTOL Parameter Evaluation Tool

Progressive 3-step workflow

Analyze Parameter File

Upload the current .param or .parm file, optionally add symptom context, and get a bench-first verdict before another retest.

Props off before actuator or output testing.
Step 1 · File inputChoose the current .param or .parm file and confirm the quick parse summary before analysis.
Step 2 · Symptom contextChoose the primary symptom so the tool can rank the most relevant fault lanes first.
Step 3 · Output displayStart with the safety verdict, top three likely causes, and immediate props-off action.
Step 1 · File input

No file selected

Client-side file handling
Parameter files are parsed locally inside your browser; no raw configuration files are uploaded to Arimota servers during this self-service analysis.
The reference file is a troubleshooting guide, not a copy source.
Compare with a similar reference file

No reference file selected

More actions
Saved result files keep the findings you export; Arimota does not retain the raw parameter upload when you use the self-service tool. On supported Chromium browsers, the first save can write into VTOL Review Results inside your chosen Arimota pCloud folder.
Learn how this works Method, references, diagrams, watchlists, and saved case studies Optional details

What the tool checks before it suggests another test.

This review follows the normal fixed-wing QuadPlane setup order: confirm the VTOL stack is enabled, verify orientation and outputs on the bench, check tilt or forward-thrust geometry, then use short logged retests instead of speculative changes.

Official ArduPilot references are built in.

The page carries a curated embedded ArduPilot VTOL reference set and ranks the most relevant official pages for each symptom and finding.

QuadPlane and VTOL detection come first.

QuadPlane support only exists after Q_ENABLE is enabled. If the file is not really a fixed-wing VTOL or QuadPlane setup, the tool stops instead of pretending otherwise.

Orientation comes before tuning.

HUD attitude, board orientation, and wrong-way correction checks happen before any motor-order or PID advice.

Output mapping tells the real aircraft story.

Servo functions, hover-motor outputs, forward-thrust outputs, tilt outputs, and reversals often explain more than a raw diff count, especially on 4+1 and tilt-rotor aircraft.

Transition geometry is a flight gate.

A front motor that is not truly vertical in VTOL mode, or a 4+1 forward-thrust lane that is mapped wrong, can look like a tuning problem while actually being a geometry or output problem.

Retests stay short and logged.

The tool favors minimal reversible changes, props-off confirmation, and short hover-only retests with logs after each pass.

Aircraft and parameter visuals

Open the layout and geometry reference cards only when you need them.

Tilt-rotor layout Hover thrust stays vertical first Wing and fuselage Tilt motor Tilt motor

Confirm both tilt lanes agree on vertical thrust, neutral angles, and the direction each servo should travel before transition logic matters.

Lift-plus-cruise / 4+1 layout Fuselage Forward thrust Four hover motors plus one forward-thrust lane

A 4+1 file should clearly separate hover-motor ownership from the forward-thrust output. If those lanes blur together, the file story is already wrong.

Motor direction check Expected direction Wrong-way thrust risk Check motor order and spin before hover

Motor order and spin direction are still first-pass crash checks. A pretty tune cannot save a motor lane that is pushing the wrong way.

Servo direction and tilt geometry Expected tilt Reversed tilt risk Neutral angle first, then direction, then endpoints

Tilt-servo direction errors masquerade as tuning trouble all the time. Verify neutral geometry, travel direction, and endpoints on the bench first.

Flight controller orientation Forward Left Right AHRS orientation must match the real airframe

If the controller thinks forward is right, every downstream correction lane becomes suspect. Orientation is a gate, not a footnote.

Hover-to-forward transition and comparison logic Known-good Stable baseline Problem aircraft Rank the risky differences Use the baseline to shrink the fault lanes Compare similar aircraft. Do not cargo-cult copy values.

The baseline aircraft is there to narrow the search, not to grant blind permission to copy settings into different geometry.

VTOL database watchlists

Prebuilt hover, transition, and fixed-wing offender lists stay here so they do not block the primary safety path.

Ready when the file is

Step 3 · Output display appears after validation.

After analysis, the first screen stays limited to the safety verdict, the top three likely causes, and the immediate props-off action. Full diagnostics, output maps, references, and debug trace stay collapsed until you ask for them.